This jihadist’s name is not Michael Adebowale. It is Ismail ibn Abdullah. That is the name he uses since he converted to Islam. Why does the mainstream media persist in calling him by his slave name? The mainstream media would find it racist and disrespectful to call Muhammad Ali “Cassius Clay,” right? Why isn’t it racist and disrespectful to continue to call Ismail ibn Abdullah “Michael Adebowale”? Is it because Muhammad Ali is a revered, beloved figure, while Ismail ibn Abdullah reflects poorly upon his adopted religion, having murdered in its “defense”?
This story also says that Ismail ibn Abdullah “flipped during a hospital visit.” He “flipped”? The man is a jihad killer. He saw his chance to wound, perhaps mortally, another Infidel in the service of the Satanic British government, thereby pleasing Allah even more than he already has. And look: the Qur’an says “when you meet the unbelievers, strike at their necks” (47:4). But Ismail ibn Abdullah instead struck only at this unbeliever’s eye: clearly he is a moderate.